Saturday, August 29, 2015

ENCORE #19! – “What would men like better: bigger boobs or nicer hair?” vs “What if I don’t have either one?”


http://voluume.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Encore-Sessions.jpg
From the first moment my wife discovered she had breast cancer, there was a deafening silence from the men I know. Even ones whose wives, mothers or girlfriends had breast cancer seemed to have received a gag order from some Central Cancer Command and did little more than mumble about the experience. Not one to shut up for any known reason, I started this blog…That was four years ago – as time passed, people searching for answers stumbled across my blog and checked out what I had to say. The following entry appeared in August of 2011.

My wife was watching TV during one of her after-chemo days, when some daytime TV jabber show popped on. I don’t know which show it was (she didn’t say), but subject of discussion was the question above: What would men like better: bigger boobs or nicer hair?”

Now don’t get me wrong, television always goes for the spectacular, often ignoring truth or reality. I KNOW they were trying to get a rise out of the audience, increase ratings and sell Lexuses and tampons. I KNOW they think they’re being cute, creative, and provocative.

This time they ended up being hurtful and in bad taste – I mean “plumber’s butt crack with a bad case of gas” bad taste. And not just hurting feelings, attacking 1 in 8 women in the US (the number who will be diagnosed with breast cancer some time in their lives) or 2.5 MILLION women (who are breast cancer survivors.)

Not only that, it intentionally and maliciously attacks males as being too shallow to see anything beyond boobs and hair – when the simple fact is that most men DO see past boobs and hair.

It’s sadly humorous that were this show to target any other group of people, the American Civil Liberties Union and various other watchdog groups would be all over them.

But because it is attempting to make women with breast cancer who have had their breasts disfigured with lumpectomies; who have had one or both breasts removed by mastectomies; who have lost their hair through chemotherapy or radiation treatments – feel worse about themselves than they already do (and men to feel shallow and self-centered with absolutely no hope of changing) – the show is okey-dokey with its producers, advertisers and media executives (not to mention the show hosts and audience members).

My question then, is this: “What the heck kind of world do we live in?”

I guess the obvious answer is this: “One that doesn’t give a rodent’s waste end about viciously attacking vulnerable people.”

Harrumph…yeah, I’m struggling.

Have a nice day.

Saturday, August 22, 2015

Claudia Alexander dies at 56; JPL researcher oversaw Galileo, Rosetta missions by Elaine Woo (LA Times)


Inspiration for US ALL -- Fight Breast Cancer HARDER Because Black Lives Matter -- Indeed ALL Lives Matter!




Tania Scott's photo.

 


a Colleagues at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory said Claudia Alexander was particularly keen on engaging the public in space science. In her spare time, she wrote two books on science for children.
Claudia Alexander, a NASA scientist who oversaw the dramatic conclusion of the space agency's long-lived Galileo mission to Jupiter and managed the United States' role in the international comet-chasing Rosetta project, died July 11 at Methodist Hospital of Southern California in Arcadia. She was 56.

The cause was breast cancer, said her sister, Suzanne Alexander.

During nearly three decades at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Cañada Flintridge, Alexander was known for her research on subjects including solar wind, Jupiter and its moons, and the evolution and inner workings of comets.

JPL scientist Claudia Alexander, pictured in 2014, was the U.S. manager for the international comet-chasing Rosetta project. (Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)

She was the last project manager of Galileo, one of the most successful missions for exploring the distant reaches of the solar system. Alexander was leading the mission when scientists orchestrated its death dive into Jupiter's dense atmosphere in 2003, when the spacecraft finally ran out of fuel after eight years orbiting the giant planet.

Most recently, she was Rosetta's U.S. project manager, coordinating with the European Space Agency on the orbiter's journey to rendezvous with the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko comet as it circles the sun.

Colleagues said Alexander was particularly keen on engaging the public in space science.

She spearheaded Rosetta's efforts to involve amateur astronomers through social media and recognize the value of their ground-level observations of the spacecraft's path toward deep space. In particular, she spurred the creation of a Facebook group where members of the amateur community post comments on their sightings and interact with her and other scientists.

“Claudia's vision was to engage and empower the amateur community via various social media… a new wrinkle on the concept” of public engagement in NASA’s missions, said Padma A. Yanamandra-Fisher, a senior research scientist with the Space Science Institute who coordinated the outreach.

I was a pretty lonely girl. I was the only black girl in pretty much an all-white school and spent a lot of time by myself -- with my imagination.- Claudia Alexander

She "had a special understanding of how scientific discovery affects us all, and how our greatest achievements are the result of teamwork, which came easily to her," JPL director Charles Elachi said in a statement. "Her insight into the scientific process will be sorely missed."

Alexander was born in Vancouver, Canada, on May 30, 1959. She moved to the Silicon Valley with her family when she was 1 and grew up in Santa Clara. Her father, Harold Alexander, was a social worker and her mother, Gaynelle, was a corporate librarian for chip-maker Intel.
As an African American in a predominantly white community, Alexander felt isolated. Writing became a refuge for her.
According to the obituary: 'She wanted to study journalism at UC Berkeley, but her parents "would only agree to pay for it if I majored in something 'useful,' like engineering," she said in an interview for the Rosetta website.' Fortunately, her parents steered her...
"I was a pretty lonely girl," she recalled in a feature for the University of Michigan's Engineering Magazine. "I was the only black girl in pretty much an all-white school and spent a lot of time by myself — with my imagination."

She wanted to study journalism at UC Berkeley, but her parents "would only agree to pay for it if I majored in something 'useful,' like engineering," she said in an interview for the Rosetta website.

During college she became an engineering intern at NASA's Ames Research Center near San Jose. But she found herself drawn to the space facility and visited it as often as she could. Her supervisor eventually arranged for her to intern in the space science division.

She went on to earn a bachelor's degree in geophysics at UC Berkeley and a master's in geophysics and space physics at UCLA. At the University of Michigan, she wrote her doctoral thesis on comet thermophysical nuclear modeling and earned a PhD in atmospheric, oceanic and space sciences.

In 1986, she joined JPL as a team member for Galileo, which was still years from launching.

In 2000, she became Rosetta's U.S. project scientist at the relatively young age of 40.

"She was always looking to improve the project and make things flow better," said Paul Weissman, an interdisciplinary scientist on Rosetta. "Europeans can be difficult about collaborations. Claudia would get people to open up and work together."

In 2003, she became Galileo project manager, guiding efforts to destroy the venerable spacecraft to prevent it from accidentally crashing into and contaminating any of Jupiter's moons.

She had also served as a science coordinator on the Cassini mission to Saturn.

In her spare time, Alexander wrote two books on science for children and mentored young people, especially African American girls. "She wanted children of color to see themselves as scientists," her sister Suzanne said.

A fan of the steampunk movement in science fiction, Alexander wrote and published short stories in the genre. She wore the Victorian-style clothing associated with steampunk fashion when she taped a TED talk on how to engage youths in math and science. Her lecture will be released later this year.

Alexander was never married and had no children. Besides her mother and sister, she is survived by a brother, David Alexander.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times

 

Saturday, August 15, 2015

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH RIGHT NOW! #36: Low Level Laser Treatment of Post-Breast Cancer Arm Lymphedema


http://www.bayswater.ca/pictures/imgwrst.jpg
From the first moment my wife discovered she had breast cancer, there was a deafening silence from the men I know. Even ones whose wives, mothers or girlfriends had breast cancer seemed to have received a gag order from some Central Cancer Command and did little more than mumble about the experience. Not one to shut up for any known reason, I started this blog…

Every month, I’ll be highlighting breast cancer research that is going on RIGHT NOW! Harvested from different websites, journals and podcasts, I’ll translate them into understandable English and share them with you. Today: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3887507/

After our last visit to the lymphedema clinic and the response of the staff there when my wife asked about a cure, I will now be focusing the “BC Research Right Now!” entries on the subject of lymphedema treatment.

This first entry is NOT something that the clinic we go to has ever offered, and it may be something I suggest we ask for.

It’s called Low Level Laser Therapy or LLLT. Below you’ll find the description of a recent study using it:

“Low level laser therapy (LLLT) (wave lengths 650-1000 nm) is a…therapeutic intervention for treatment of arm lymphedema. [It] can be administered by individuals trained in the use of the device…[and] is believed to stimulate lymphatic movement and lymphangiogenesis (‘the formation of lymphatic vessels from pre-existing lymphatic vessels’, IOW, ‘growing new lymph vessels’); [increase] macrophage activity, and soften fibrotic tissues; improve contractility in the tissues that assist with lymph transport through the lymphatic vessels. These mechanisms increase movement of pooled fluid from the extracellular spaces into the lymphatic system for transport.

“Studies have evaluated the influence of LLLT on lymphedema in breast cancer survivors with mixed results regarding amount of volume reduction and degree of symptom relief...None of these studies reported complications. Although the number of sessions and exposure time to the laser varied across studies, overall results are supportive of the procedure as a lymphedema treatment and demonstrate the feasibility of conducting studies in breast cancer survivors with lymphedema.

“LLLT offers APNs trained in the use of the device an opportunity to directly provide treatment for their patients with lymphedema. Demonstrated successful use [and] could impact current standards of care and treatment delivery by offering alternatives to current treatment, earlier intervention, and increasing access to a pool of providers.

“Based upon the physiological mechanisms of action ascribed to LLLT, the authors of this article theorized that it should reduce lymphatic-associated swelling. The purpose of the pilot study was to examine the impact of [the treatment], as both a stand-alone and complementary treatment for arm volume, symptoms, and Quality of Life in breast cancer survivors with treatment-related lymphedema and to use data obtained in this study to power future studies.”

The hospital we go to has a cancer center with a strong breast cancer component and they are the place where we discovered massage therapy for the reduction of arm volume – what’s known as “manual lymphatic drainage” and includes both home-massage and wearing a compression garment on the arm.

 The results of the study, while not phenomenal or “world-shaking” do, in fact point to the use of LLLT as an adjunct to typical massage and compression treatments: “a 20 minute dose of LLLT when followed immediately by compression bandaging is potentially as effective in reduction of arm volume as 40 minute sessions of MLD or combined MLD and LLLT followed by compression bandaging . This preliminary finding is noteworthy, as the shorter duration of each LLLT session is less burdensome to patients and less time consuming for therapists.”

Less time wasted – that’s an improvement. We’ll have to see if the clinic we go to offers this treatment!

Saturday, August 8, 2015

ENCORE #18! – WHY Do So MANY Women Have Breast Cancer?


http://voluume.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Encore-Sessions.jpgFrom the first moment my wife discovered she had breast cancer, there was a deafening silence from the men I know. Even ones whose wives, mothers or girlfriends had breast cancer seemed to have received a gag order from some Central Cancer Command and did little more than mumble about the experience. Not one to shut up for any known reason, I started this blog…That was four years ago – as time passed, people searching for answers stumbled across my blog and checked out what I had to say. The following entry appeared in June of 2011.

The roommate of our foster daughter is somewhat estranged from her mother and through the grapevine last week, discovered that her mother had had a preliminary diagnosis of breast cancer. It turned out to be benign cysts, but my wife raised the immediate question: Why do so MANY women have breast cancer?

A legislator in the district in which I live sent an email to her constituency that she had finished a recent session (though it ended deadlocked and a special session is in the works). She also shared that she was in the final stages of ovarian cancer and she was in hospice. We all raised the question: Why do so MANY women have cancer?

Is it something in the environment? Is it the fast food and processed foods we eat constantly? Is it because we’re living longer that cancers get a chance to grow? Is it because we’re better at detection now and deaths that were at one time “unexplained” now have a clear cause?

Well, a dose of the facts never hurt anyone – it only shakes preconceived notions and perceptions.

FACT: Incidence of Breast Cancer

1975-80 –       held steady at 110/100,000 women

1980-87 –       increased by 4% per year

1987-1994 –   held steady at 140/100,000 women

1994-99 –       increased by 2% per year

1999-2006 – decreased by 2% per year to 120/100,000 women


What causes breast cancer? The short, concise answer is: “Don’t know, trying to find out.”

There are risk factors – none of which are related to the environment or food additives. In order, they are advancing age, family history, use of hormones, high doses of radiation (ie – nuclear reactor), obesity, booze and a fatty diet.

So as people get older and exercise less they increase the risk of breast cancer. The perception that it’s everywhere, while frightening, isn’t exactly true – HOWEVER the fact that the longer you live the more friends you have is an observable phenomenon. That increase in the number of friends makes it a statistical certainty that your chance of knowing someone with breast cancer will approach 100%.

This all means…what?

For me it means I will continue to write this blog; next year I will join one of the endurance events targeting fund raising to find a cure for breast cancer and I’ll speak at Cooper’s Relay For Life like they asked me to do this year.

It means we’ll all keep fighting, bankrolling, inspiring and looking for ways that a cure for one kind of cancer can apply to another kind of cancer.

Saturday, August 1, 2015

GUY’S GOTTA TALK ABOUT...#17 Our Anniversary



From the first moment my wife discovered she had breast cancer, there was a deafening silence from the men I know. Even ones whose wives, mothers or girlfriends had breast cancer seemed to have received a gag order from some Central Cancer Command and did little more than mumble about the experience. Not one to shut up for any known reason, I started this blog…