Saturday, July 21, 2018

ENCORE #92! – Approaching Targeted Treatments!

From the first moment my wife discovered she had breast cancer, there was a deafening silence from the men I know. Even ones whose wives, mothers or girlfriends had breast cancer seemed to have received a gag order from some Central Cancer Command and did little more than mumble about the experience. Not one to shut up for any known reason, I started this blog…That was four years ago – as time passed, people searching for answers stumbled across my blog and checked out what I had to say. The following entry appeared in April of 2016.


The thing most associated with those who suffer from the plethora of cancers that attack humans, is a person with a bald head – women and children in particular.

Nothing stirs us like an image of a child who has no hair, because we know perfectly well that they are sick. Nothing so makes the heart of a man quail as a bald woman. Nothing drives home the truth of our mortality as the sight of a woman we love who has lost all of her hair...

Those who have gone through radiation treatment or chemotherapy know that the death of hair follicles is one the side effects of the treatment. It happens because doctors and researchers are unable to precisely target treatments that ONLY destroy cancer cells: “Due to the body’s own defense mechanisms, most cancer drugs are absorbed into healthy tissue causing negative side effects, and only a fraction of the administered drug actually reaches the tumor, making it less effective, said Mauro Ferrari, PhD, president and CEO of the Houston Methodist Research Institute.”

Research Right Now! has been pushing for methods of introducing anti-cancer agents directly to the cancer cells.

Nanoparticles are one way researchers are doing this.

What’s a nanoparticle? Literally, it’s a particle that is one billionth the size of a meter.

In this line of research, scientists literally encase a cancer drug like tamoxifen (I’ve written about it here: http://breastcancerreaper.blogspot.com/2015/03/encore-8-take-tamoxifen-for-ten-years.html) in FAT. The particle can then be covered with a substance that will only attach to a cell that has a particular “cancer taste” on it. Then it delivers its death package and gets absorbed into the body.

Sounds simple, right?

It ain’t!

“The Houston Methodist team used doxorubicin [which] has adverse side effects to the heart and is not an effective treatment against metastatic disease…each component has a specific and essential role in the drug delivery process… [a] nanoporous silicon material…[plus] a polymer made up of multiple strands that contain doxorubicin [are taken] inside the tumor, the silicon material degrades, releasing the strands…these strands curl-up to form nanoparticles that are taken up by the cancer cells…the acidic pH close to the nucleus causes the drug to be released from the nanoparticles. Inside the nucleus…”

There is plenty of room for problems here, but the research grant they have has led to the point where “Houston Methodist…plans to fast-track the research to obtain FDA-approval and begin safety and efficacy studies in humans in 2017.”

We haven’t reached the point of delivering an anti-cancer vaccine (which GUY’S GOTTA TALK will focus on next time – though I’ll leave you with a teaser: “I Am Legend – the Movie”) – but we are moving toward a day where maybe my daughter and surely my granddaughter, will no longer have to dread  a cancer diagnosis.

Image: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5527/10893068965_1d328e8f71_b.jpg

Saturday, July 14, 2018

GUY’S GOTTA TALK ABOUT #43…It’s Funny, But It’s Not – Breast Cancer and the Bombing of Hiroshima


From the first moment my wife discovered she had breast cancer, there was a deafening silence from the men I know. Even ones whose wives, mothers or girlfriends had breast cancer seemed to have received a gag order from some Central Cancer Command and did little more than mumble about the experience. Not one to shut up for any known reason, I started this blog…

It’s funny, but it’s not that the whole breast cancer ordeal feels over.

It’s not over. My wife continues to live in the shadow of the aftermath. Sort of like the old move, “The Day After”.

On November 20, 1983, American television aired a movie that realistically explored what would happen if there was a real exchange of nuclear weapons between the US and the Soviet Union. It had a profound effect in that rather than focusing on the war itself – though it did show the explosion of warheads on US soil and over cities – its purpose was to explore what happened to normal people left with virtually nothing.

I watched it from Toronto, Canada and was completely creeped out. I said several times to myself and those I was watching it with. The fact that Korean Air Lines flight 007 had been shot down by the Soviet Union, killing all 269 passengers and crew aboard on September 1, 1983 (including 62 Americans and others from 16 countries) – a mere eleven weeks earlier; only made it more real.

There was drama there, as there was drama in the initial years of the breast cancer diagnosis.

But we’re now in the long-term effects of the diagnosis, treatment, and recovery.

What has Hollywood done representing the long-term effects of nuclear war? It didn’t have to do anything. Documentary film makers visited Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan almost immediately after the bombing while others went sixty years later and interviewed survivors.

I haven’t seen these movies, but I DID see “The Day After”. I think that my life right now, as well as that of my wife, is in the exploration of the aftermath of the destruction of our lives. She is a survivor, assuredly. I am a survivor of a sort. Maybe I need to see if there are movies about people who lived on the island of Etajima, which was an island in Hiroshima Bay, south of the main city. What were their lives that day? What are their lives like now? Are there any survivors who lived there who have been interviewed?

Has their story ever been written?

Hmmm…I also just had an idea last night about a person who collects the six flags that astronauts left on the Moon. Could I meld this into something that would reflect my thoughts about living on that island and loving a survivor of the first atomic attack in Human history – and using it to explore my thoughts about being the husband of a breast cancer survivor? We’ll see.


Saturday, July 7, 2018

ENCORE #91! – *lie* SHARKS DON’T GET CANCER!!! *lie*


From the first moment my wife discovered she had breast cancer, there was a deafening silence from the men I know. Even ones whose wives, mothers or girlfriends had breast cancer seemed to have received a gag order from some Central Cancer Command and did little more than mumble about the experience. Not one to shut up for any known reason, I started this blog…That was four years ago – as time passed, people searching for answers stumbled across my blog and checked out what I had to say. The following entry appeared in March of 2016.

Cancer.

I hate that word.

Why can’t we just get the secret of sharks, because as everyone knows, sharks don’t get cancer!

Unfortunately, that’s a lie...following the link above will give you a look at a truly gross picture that proves, once and for all that sharks DO get cancer! So stop spreading the fable!

On the other hand, ARE there living things that don’t experience the uncontrolled growth of cells?

As far as we can tell, yes. They are NOT as the horrifyingly threatening creature that bears razor-sharp teeth and was immortalized by a musical bar containing “a simple alternating pattern of two notes—variously identified as E and F or F and F sharp”. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaws_(soundtrack))

According to the second article, while elephants DO get cancer, the rate is remarkably less that Humans: “only 5% of elephants die of cancer in comparison to more than 20% humans”, this despite the fact that there are more cells in an elephant to GET cancer with!

The other animal that doesn’t get cancer is the…(pause for effect) naked mole rat.

Ewwww…

However, “as far as we know, [these animals] never develop cancer. Even if researchers try to induce cancer through artificial means.” The reason appears to be that there’s a substance called hyaluronan. It’s a polymer, a long string of natural sugars that both makes the cells stronger as well as prevents the wild overgrowing of cells that we call cancer.

The thing is, is that Humans DO have hyaluronan, but it’s used for different things like balancing the exchange of water and plasma in the bloodstream, it may be a factor in cell division (aka mitosis), and cell movement. It also seems to play a role in deciding what kind of cell will grow from a basic type – muscle, nerve, liver, etc. It’s recognized as having the ability to protect cells and as such, it is used in eye surgery. Even so, it ALSO appears that conversely to what it does in the naked mole rat, hyaluronan that accumulates in between cells can cause them to malfunction.

Complex reactions that we don’t quite understand yet – but…but…but… “Rochelle Buffenstein, a physiologist at the University of Texas Health Science Center [said], ‘As we learn more about these cancer-resistant mechanisms that are effective and can be directly pertinent to humans, we may find new cancer prevention strategies.’”